13/04/2026
𝗜𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 & 𝗣𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲 is where a technically 'good' product can fail.
It's because it doesn't know what job it's supposed to do.
At its centre, this The Sensory Advantage pillar is about whether the product expresses a recognisable identity, at a strength that matches its role. But not every product should stand out in the same way.
• 𝗔 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 should feel immediately familiar and trustworthy. If it’s too distinctive, it creates friction i.e. people hesitate because it doesn’t match what they expect the category to be.
• 𝗔 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝗴𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 needs to be clearly more expressive. It should amplify something specific such as flavour, texture, or character in a way that feels intentional, not accidental. If it plays too safe, it disappears. If it pushes too far without control, it becomes polarising.
• 𝗔 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 can afford to be more extreme or unconventional, but it still needs a recognisable anchor. If consumers can’t place it, they won’t know how to engage with it.
Where teams go wrong is treating identity as a branding problem, rather than an experiential signal. For example when:
• The first sip doesn’t confirm what the product claims to be.
• The intensity is mismatched to its intended role.
• It either blends into the category or sticks out in the wrong way.
From a performance perspective, this shows up as:
• Slower uptake (people don’t 'get it')
• Misaligned expectations (increased cognitive friction)
• Weak repeat activity (because the experience doesn’t land as intended)
The practical question isn’t '𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥?'
It’s: '𝘋𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦, 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭?'
When Identity & Role is right, the product feels self-evident. But when it’s wrong, everything else has to work harder to compensate.
While nose, plate, and finish has become the doctrine for assessing drinks, if we shift our metrics to assess the principles behind a successful product, we achieve a more commercially beneficial data set.