07/14/2025
URGENT: MEETING TOMORROW, Call today: Stop Pesticide Immunity Shield
Tell Subcommittee to REMOVE Section 453 on Pesticides
Keep Pesticide Manufacturers Accountable for Injury
Congress is considering federal legislation that would grant pesticide companies sweeping legal immunityânot only for Roundup, but for over 16,000 pesticide products regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The House Appropriations Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Subcommittee is meeting tomorrow [Tuesday, July 15] at 10:00 a.m. Eastern to markup the âFiscal Year 2026 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Billâ; unfortunately, Section 453 includes language that grants Total Pesticide Immunity by prohibiting EPA from approving a label or taking action inconsistent with a âhuman health assessmentâ or âcarcinogenicity classificationâ previously approved by the EPAâfreezing the EPA's position on a pesticide in place for decades, and eliminating the ability to hold the company accountable. [See page 196 under âPESTICIDESâ]
Section 453 needs to be removed from the bill. The 7/14/25 press release claims that the bill is intended, in part, to ensure âchemical and pesticide manufacturers are not overburdened with requirements that would drive businesses overseas and threaten American competitiveness.â The bill also aims to reduce EPA funding by 23%, but Section 453 has no direct impact on funding.
ACTION TO TAKE
1. Contact all the subcommittee members and tell them to vote to REMOVE Section 453 from the Appropriations Bill. It is especially important to contact a subcommittee member if you are a constituent or have some other connection. Phone numbers for the subcommittee are listed below after the Talking Points.
Find your U.S. Representative by entering your address at
https://www.congress.gov/members
2. View the live-stream of the bill markup which is scheduled for 10 a.m. July 15th; go to YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/live/u8YgWDYVxDs
TALKING POINTS
1. This isnât about one product â itâs about the future of 16,000 chemicals. From household weedkillers to restricted-use agricultural pesticides, this legislation would apply across the board. It gives companies a free pass, even when they conceal risks or fail to warn about dangersâas long as their label was once approved by the EPA.
2. The EPA doesnât independently test these products â it relies on the companies. Federal law allows pesticide manufacturers to submit their own safety studies. The EPA does not conduct its own testing and relies heavily on industry submitted studies. And when companies manipulate or withhold critical dataâas theyâve done in the pastâthis bill would still protect them. Immunity rewards companies for hiding the truth.
3. This legislation eliminates accountability â even when companies break the rules. It would override state protections, block juries from hearing the facts, and tie the hands of farmers and families when harm is caused. Illnesses linked to these pesticides include cancer, Parkinsonâs disease, infertility, and developmental harm to children. If this becomes law, even when companies act unreasonably or deceptively, foreign chemical companies couldn't be held responsible.
4. It gives total immunity to Chinese military controlled pesticide giants. ChemChinaâa state-owned company the Pentagon identifies as a Chinese military entityâowns Syngenta, which sells paraquat and hundreds of other EPA regulated pesticides in the U.S. despite some of them being banned in China. If this bill passes, American families could be barred from suing a Chinese military-controlled company for harm caused by its dangerous products. Why would Congress protect China instead of American farmers and families?
5. It protects companies that destroy farmersâ crops â even when they lied to get EPA approval. If this bill passes, nothing would stop a foreign chemical from pushing a new product they know is likely to drift or damage nearby fields. They could downplay the risks to the EPA, get a label approved, and leave neighboring farmers with scorched crops, lost yields, and no legal recourse. Even when livelihoods are wiped out, immunity means farmers would be stuck with the costsânot the companies who caused the damage
WAPF will be sending out future alerts on the pesticide liability shield as events warrant.
House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies(EventID=118507)