18/05/2026
https://www.facebook.com/share/1ChTxSPHhG/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Britain has 17.5 million hectares of agricultural land, but 65% of it is entirely unsuitable for crops.
It is too rocky, too steep, too wet, and too high-terrain where driving a tractor is less of a farming method and more of a hazard.
What this land can do is grow grass. Because your stomach cannot digest grass, we rely on cattle and sheep to convert it into food.
If you remove livestock from these hills, food production doesn't just decline; it hits absolute zero. Ruminants aren't blocking a better agricultural option; they are the only option.
Eliminating British livestock doesn't stop meat consumption. it merely outsources it. It trades British hillsides for cleared Amazonian rainforest, shifting production to Brazilian feedlots and shipping the meat 6,000 miles in refrigerated containers.
While the British countryside reverts to bracken, the Amazon is replaced by soy, and supermarket labels simply swap Hereford for Mato Grosso.
Presenting this environmental displacement as an ethical victory is one of the greatest self-deceptions in modern politics.
