01/05/2024
DIFFERENT FRUITING STAGES OF DATE PALM
ACCORDING TO DPP (DAYS POST POLLINATION)
(A) Different fruiting stages of date palm according to DPP* (days post-pollination) showing Khalal, Rutab and Tamr, the three edible stages of the fruit.
(B) The anatomy of the date fruit at Tamr stage showing the epicarp, mesocarp, endocarp and seed. Date fruits develop through five different stages Hanabauk, Kimri, Khalal (or Bisr),Rutab, and Tamr as shown in the given image. The fruits become edible in the final three stages as a result of decreased bitterness, increased sweetness, and improved tenderness, and succulence. Different varieties of date fruits may variably be harvested at the Khalal, Rutab, and/or Tamr stages with best time of harvesting being dependent on variety.
(C) At Tamr stage, date fruits vary in size, shape, color, texture and flavor depending on the variety and agro-climatic conditions. The number of date varieties grown globally exceeds 2000 but < 10% of these are described regarding their characteristics. Tamr fruits shape varies from oval to cylindrical with dimensions from 3 to 11 cm long and 2 to 3 cm diameter and color from yellow, brown, red, to black. The fruits are also different in the hardness of the edible part and are classified according to their moisture contents at fresh Tamr stage into soft (≥ 30% moisture), semi-dry (20–30% moisture) and dry varieties (≤ 20% moisture, < 0.65 water activity)
(D) Generally, fruits of soft date cultivars are dominated by invert sugars (fructose & glucose) and contain little or no sucrose while dry varieties may contain a relatively high proportion of sucrose. According to sugar type, date varieties are classified into (i) invert sugar varieties containing mainly the invert sugars glucose, and fructose (e.g. Barhi and Saidy), (ii) mixed sugar varieties (e.g. Khadrawy, Halawy, Zahidi, and Sayer), and (iii) cane sugar varieties containing sucrose as the main sugar (e.g. Deglet Noor and Deglet Beidha). There is some agreement and disparity in the classification of date varieties according to moisture content or sugar type suggesting that the relationship is not strictly linear possible due to interference from fiber content and type.