Aqua World Systems - North Dallas

09/23/2022

Sales Representative.

02/18/2021

Fort Worth,Texas.

They extend the order to boil the water of the city of Fort Worth and other cities of North Texas.
Fort Worth; Keller; Hazlet; Saginaw; Roanoke, Lake worth; Northlake; Southlake; Westlake; Trophy Club; Corsicana; Corinth-Texas.

Fort Worth, Texas.
Due to the power outages at the Eagle Mountain water treatment plant, the pressure of the drinking water that reaches homes in northern Fort Worth is below the levels required by environmental authorities. The City of Fort Worth is asking the community to boil water for human consumption. About a third of city residents should boil their water before drinking or use it to wash their hands, face and teeth.
Older people and people with a weak immune system are the most vulnerable to complications from bacteria in the water, so the authorities recommend that all customers follow the following instructions:
-To ensure the destruction of all harmful bacteria and other microbes, Water for drinking, cooking, and ice making should be boiled and cooled before use either for drinking or consumption.
-The water should be brought to a boil on vigorous and then boil it for two minutes.

01/25/2021

Water business is the future,we are Nationwide.
Looking people to start a new business, please contact me at +19366357859 .

07/19/2020

The ‘Forever Chemicals’ in 99% of Americans.
EWG.ORG

Hundreds of everyday products are made with highly toxic fluorinated chemicals called PFAS. They build up in our bodies and never break down in the environment. Very small doses of PFAS have been linked to cancer, reproductive and immune system harm, and other diseases.

For decades, chemical companies covered up evidence of PFAS’ health hazards. Today nearly all Americans, including newborn babies, have PFAS in their blood, and up to 110 million people may be drinking PFAS-tainted water.

People DON'T BELIEVE WHAT DO YOU FIND IN THE TAP WATER.
I recommend that everybody must watch the movie:
DARK Waters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvAOuhyunhY

Mark Ruffalo stars in . Get tickets: https://www.darkwaterstickets.com/ From Participant (Spotlight), DARK WATERS tells the shocking and heroic st...

07/19/2020

Study: Disposal of PFAS Waste Increases Contamination
Contact:
Monica Amarelo
(202) 939-9140
[email protected]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2020

WASHINGTON – In a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Chemosphere, scientists at the Environmental Working Group conclude that burning, discarding and flushing waste containing the toxic fluorinated chemicals known as PFAS all contribute to environmental contamination. The three standard practices for waste management outlined in the review – landfilling, wastewater treatment and incineration – do not effectively contain or destroy PFAS.

“The three common ‘disposal’ options for getting rid of PFAS do not eliminate these contaminants but rather end up just returning either the same chemicals or their byproducts back into the environment,” says Tasha Stoiber, Ph.D., EWG senior scientist and primary author of the study. “PFAS disposal is really just another step in the contamination cycle.”

Communities with contaminated water supplies increasingly look to PFAS treatment technologies, but every technology produces PFAS-laden waste. With current disposal options, the concentrated PFAS likely returns to the environment, to require removal once more. As the need to dispose of this waste grows, handling of PFAS waste at disposal sites has received more scrutiny.

PFAS are discharged by industrial facilities, released by airports and military bases using PFAS-containing firefighting foams, and sent to landfills or flushed down drains following their use in a multitude of consumer products. Vast stores of legacy firefighting foam are being sent to incinerators that are suspected of spreading the contamination to local communities. In the absence of federal regulations, PFAS receive no special treatment during the disposal process. There is no requirement to monitor for PFAS in waste streams. Contamination moves from site to site as a result, contributing to the ever-increasing list of contaminated communities.

Mapping the full PFAS contamination cycle, including what happens after disposal, is of critical importance. PFAS are called “forever chemicals” because they never break down in the environment and could move through the cycle indefinitely. These chemicals might suppress the immune system and are associated with cancer, reproductive and developmental harms, and reduced effectiveness of vaccines, among other health problems.

“The disposal of PFAS can cause environmental pollution, which disproportionately affects people and communities near the waste disposal sites,” says Olga V. Naidenko, Ph.D., vice president for science investigations at EWG. “States, the EPA and waste management companies must take strong action to protect fence-line communities from harmful exposures to PFAS.”

The paper concludes with six measures for addressing the PFAS problem:

Limiting the use of PFAS to essential applications in order to reduce industrial discharges.
Protecting the health of fence-line communities through strong public health policies.
Capturing all liquid wastes from landfills and keeping them on site.
Monitoring PFAS contamination at and near disposal sites.
Researching PFAS incineration to address current data gaps.
Researching advanced remediation technologies to generate new waste management solutions.

07/11/2020

Our Tap Water Database has information from nearly 50,000 local utilities in every state – information about everything their tests found in your community’s...

06/28/2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i46b0Z3mGY

06/27/2020

EWG News and Analysis

Testimony & Official Correspondence
EWG Experts
EWG NEWS AND ANALYSIS
The latest from EWG’s staff of experts >>

Federal Lawsuit Could Limit Fluoride in Drinking Water
By Olga Naidenko Ph.D., VP, Science Investigations

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2020
A landmark federal lawsuit that went to trial this week in California could change the longstanding practice of adding fluoride to the drinking water supplies for 200 million Americans.

The lawsuit, brought against the Environmental Protection Agency by groups including the Fluoride Action Network, Food and Water Watch and Moms Against Fluoridation, would compel the agency to require local water utilities to stop adding fluoride to tap water.

The suit claims fluoridated drinking water presents an unreasonable risk to public health and can harm the developing brain of young children and babies, causing an IQ deficit. Renowned public health experts, such as Dr. Philippe Grandjean of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, have raised concerns about fluoride neurotoxicity and questioned the safety of fluoride-contaminated drinking water.

The U.S. first began adding fluoride to drinking water in the 1940s in an attempt to combat widespread tooth decay.

In 2011, responding to a lawsuit by Fluoride Action Network, EWG and Beyond Pesticides, the Department of Health and Human Services recommended that water utilities reduce the amount of fluoride added to tap water by almost half, from 1.2 parts per million, or ppm, to 0.7 ppm. This new recommendation took effect in 2015.

The levels of fluoride added to tap water supplies can vary, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has established 0.7 ppm as a health advisory limit. EWG analysis of test data for community water systems across the country found roughly 30 million Americans are likely drinking water with fluoride levels higher than the CDC’s recommendation, as the news site Fair Warning reported Monday.

The CDC says if infant formula is mixed with fluoridated water, the baby’s teeth might be affected by dental fluorosis, which appears as white spot markings on the teeth. EWG recommends that baby formula be mixed with fluoride-free water, especially for an infant whose diet consists exclusively of powdered baby formula.

Excess fluoride exposure poses health risks, including discolored teeth, changes in the bones, and harm to the brain and nervous system. In 2017, a groundbreaking study by a team of researchers in Mexico found that exposure to fluoride during pregnancy can harm IQ and cognitive development in children. Similar results were found in a recent Canadian study.

The case is being argued before federal District Court Judge Edward M. Chen under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which gives the EPA the authority to limit or ban toxic chemicals in the nation’s municipal drinking water supply.

06/25/2020

Free in Home Water Test.

Shop elmerca2020's closet or find the perfect look from millions of stylists. Fast shipping and buyer protection. The benefits of Good Water Quality. Bad water is bad for you, but safe water is key to life and good for you. Some studies link high level of lead in drinking water to delays in physical...