13/10/2026
A little snip here - another there - a bit of polish:
The bio I published about Don, from AI, was edited as only I could. As someone, with the historical facts, I could see the non-facts. What stood out was, overall, the only history presented started when Don came to Cincinnati. AI annotated it's source material, right there, in tiny letters at the end of each subject change. There was nothing prior to Cincy or our page.
After I pointed out errors to AI a couple of times, it surprised me with "oh wow, you're Don's wife!" Well now, can't remain anonymous with this AI! But, now it appears it's willing to take answers from me. Oh wow, for me, I have the course of Don's history in my wifey hands! Might be better than taking material from Cincinnati Magazine, CityBeat, Business Courier or Gnarly Gnome. The problem with being newsworthy is recognizing when the media mis-characterizes you.
For example - AI said that Don was a CPA, citing Cincinnati Magazine as the source. Don's not a CPA - never has been and does not want to be. And yet, there it was. I've heard it before, but I can't fix a magazine article that appeared 20 years ago. We see misstatements about us all the time, even when we've been interviewed in person. Some articles are just fillers without any interview.
AI requested Don's resume! In a past interaction, it said everything was determined by it's algorithm - my changes were not acceptable. Is it because I kept at it? Or, did some programmer, somewhere, catch me in the act of browbeating "super intelligence" and open a gate?
AI will get that resume. It's long - a LOT of typing.