06/06/2026
Farmers, if you enter a grant with the USDA and any existing grants you are involved in ask the questions if you data is being collected. And make the decision that is right for you. I have always said be careful with taking money, unless you fully understand what you get yourself into.
The USDA just signed a $300 million deal with Palantir Technologies to consolidate every participating farmer’s data into a single system, land holdings, conservation practices, insurance claims and financial records, all in one place, all managed by one of the most controversial data companies in the country. The pitch sounds reasonable enough: less paperwork, faster payments, fewer trips to the county office. But the Union of Concerned Scientists is asking the question nobody in the administration seems to want to answer. Who actually benefits when a company with deep ties to ICE, the Pentagon and the IRS gets handed the keys to America’s agricultural data?
Palantir was co-founded by Peter Thiel and has built its reputation on surveillance infrastructure for the federal government. The efficiency argument is real but it is not the whole story. Farmers have historically been fiercely protective of their operational data, and for good reason. Once that information lives in a unified database run by a company with this track record, the question of how it gets used, and by whom, is no longer a hypothetical.
The Union of Concerned Scientists piece by Karen Perry Stillerman is one of the more clear eyed takes we have seen on this and it is worth reading before the conversation moves on.
👇
https://organicconsumers.org/why-linking-data-systems-at-trumps-usda-isnt-enough-and-might-be-a-disaster-for-farmers/?fbclid=IwY2xjawSP_RNleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETExaGxHVXVPZ3hpRDZ1eUNYc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHlBmMVNsfLS-9d3byN5OL0z7B_IXL-u64X9S5Qw34M1LQd9sSw13o2FzR9Eb_aem_V27K9c5nGWrPFbOr7tadmA