McGarva Ranch Pasture Division

McGarva Ranch Pasture Division Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from McGarva Ranch Pasture Division, Livestock Farm, Likely, CA.

Know the real FACTS not the manufactured NCBA narrative!
05/26/2026

Know the real FACTS not the manufactured NCBA narrative!

Part 5 of MCOOL Misconceptions: “You can’t have MCOOL without mandatory EID”

The U.S. successfully implemented MCOOL for beef and pork from 2009–2015, and it worked without mandatory electronic ID tags.

Packers already segregate beef for export markets, branded programs, organic claims, and USDA grades. MCOOL requires no new processes, only using the systems already in place and the origin information they already receive and track.

All cattle imported into the U.S. are already permanently marked with their country of origin through brands, tattoos, or eartags. When those cattle go to slaughter, packers can visually confirm origin and label the beef accordingly, for example: “Born and Raised in Canada, Slaughtered in the U.S.”

Cattle born and raised entirely in the United States have no foreign markings and can simply be labeled: “Born, Raised, and Slaughtered in the USA.” This method, known as the “presumption of domestic origin,” was already recognized in the original COOL regulations and eliminates the need for mandatory EID.

American consumers can have transparency at the grocery store without expanding government control over American cattle producers.

MCOOL existed for years without mandatory EID, and it can again.

Call (202) 224-3121 and tell Congress to .

Up next: “How does MCOOL impact imports?”

Not often given the credit she was due!
05/19/2026

Not often given the credit she was due!

At a graveside ceremony in South Texas in the spring of 1925, two hundred Mexican-American cowboys, all mounted on quarter horses bearing the running W brand of the King Ranch, formed a single column behind the coffin of the woman they had come to bury. Some had ridden for two days across open brush country to be there. Each man walked his horse in a slow circle around her grave, hat held to his chest, and moved on. When the last had finished, they remounted and rode back into the country they had come from. The woman they had ridden to honor was named Henrietta Maria Chamberlain King. She had never ridden a horse herself.

Richard King had died at the Menger Hotel in San Antonio on April 14, 1885. He had been one of the most famous cattlemen in the American Southwest. The ranch he had built up over the previous thirty-two years on the brush country of South Texas was, at the moment of his death, one of the largest privately owned working cattle operations in the United States. The obituaries the next week described him as a titan of the cattle industry. What they did not print, because they did not yet know, was what his widow found when she sat down with the ranch's account books.

Richard King had died approximately five hundred thousand dollars in debt. In modern terms, the figure works out to roughly eighteen million dollars.

Henrietta Maria Chamberlain King was fifty-two years old. She was the daughter of a Presbyterian minister and had been raised in the austere theology of the frontier Protestant church. She was, by every contemporary account of her, a woman of unusual personal discipline. She had never sought wealth. She had sought, in her own framing, to live faithfully.

Her family had been fracturing before the debt was discovered. Her son Richard Jr. had died of pneumonia two years before her husband. Two more of her children would die before she did.

The ranch in 1885 covered roughly six hundred and fourteen thousand acres of South Texas brush country, an area larger than several entire United States counties. The cattle on it were struggling through a relentless drought. The land, to a sensible outside observer at the time, was the kind of property a widow of her age and resources would have been expected to put up for sale, settle her late husband's debts, and walk away from.

She did not walk away.

She put on the black of a Victorian widow, and she walked toward the ranch instead. She would wear black, every single day, for the next forty years.

She brought in her son-in-law, a young attorney named Robert Justus Kleberg who had recently married her daughter Alice, to manage the day-to-day operations of the ranch. Every significant financial decision, however, continued to pass across her desk. She read the ledgers. She approved the contracts. She decided, year by year, what kind of ranch the King Ranch was going to become.

What it became was something almost no observer in 1885 would have predicted.

She authorized the drilling of artesian wells across land that the cattlemen of her period had largely written off as too dry to be useful, and the wells worked. She authorized the cattle-dipping programs that were eventually adopted across Texas as part of the federal campaign to eradicate the tick that had been killing herds across the southern United States for decades. She authorized the long-term crossbreeding experiments that would, decades later, produce the Santa Gertrudis breed, the first beef cattle breed ever developed in the Western Hemisphere.

Then, in the early years of the twentieth century, she built a town.

When the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway was looking for a route through South Texas, Henrietta King donated a substantial parcel of King Ranch land — by the most commonly cited figure, around ninety thousand acres — to bring the rail line across her property. She had decided, in her seventies, that isolated land died and that connected land thrived. The depot the railway built stood on her land. The town that grew up around the depot was named after the family. She called it Kingsville.

She built the local high school. She donated land for churches of various denominations. She funded a hospital in Corpus Christi. She donated the land for what would eventually become Texas A&M University-Kingsville.

Every property deed she issued in Kingsville carried a single restriction. No alcohol could ever be sold on the land. The restriction was perpetual. It ran with the deed in a form that no future owner could remove. She had made a private decision about alcohol decades earlier, and she had decided that the town she was building would carry that decision into the generations after her.

She continued to wear black, every day, for forty years.

She died on the King Ranch on March 31, 1925, at the age of ninety-two. By the time of her death, the property had grown from the six hundred and fourteen thousand acres she had inherited in 1885 to more than one point one million acres. The ranch had been brought, through her four decades of stewardship, into full economic health. She was, in 1925, one of the wealthiest women in the world.

The funeral took place on the ranch.

The vaqueros came. The Kineños — the Mexican-American working families of the King Ranch, many of whom had been on the property for two and sometimes three generations, descended from the original Mexican cowboys Richard King had hired in the eighteen-fifties — rode in from across the country to be present at the burial of the patrona. They came on horseback. They came on the quarter horses the King Ranch itself bred. The horses they rode carried, branded on the hip, the running W that had marked King Ranch animals since the founder's time. Some of the riders had spent two days on the trail to be there.

They lined up at the graveside. One by one, in silence, each rider walked his horse in a slow circle around the open grave, hat held to his chest. When the last man had completed the circle, the entire body of riders remounted and turned for home.

She had not been a rider. She had been something the cattle culture of South Texas had not, until her, particularly had a name for — a woman who had inherited a failing ranch in widowhood, refused to dismantle it, and spent the next forty years building it into one of the largest working cattle operations in the world.

She had spent her forty years of widowhood making absolutely certain that the men in front of her grave that day would always have somewhere to ride.

05/17/2026
Ross teaches lamb butchery!! Start’m young!
05/04/2026

Ross teaches lamb butchery!!
Start’m young!

04/03/2026

Part 2 of MCOOL Misconceptions: “Doesn’t ‘Product of the USA’ fix this?”

For too long, imported beef could be repackaged and labeled as “Product of USA.”

We support USDA’s updated “Product of USA” label that took effect earlier this year because it tightens the definition and stops foreign beef from being labeled as American. The campaign also helps drive greater consumer awareness about where beef comes from and brings labeling back into the national conversation.

But it’s still a voluntary label.

It’s an important step, but it’s not the finish line. It only partially corrects a decades-old mistake that harmed American cattle producers and misled consumers.

That’s why mandatory country of origin labeling is still the goal.

Because consumers deserve to know where their beef comes from, and American cattle producers shouldn’t have to compete against unlabeled foreign imports in their own market.

Only MCOOL ensures all beef is clearly labeled at the grocery store as to where it was born, raised, and harvested.

MCOOL isn’t something USDA or any administration can implement on its own. It was created by statute and repealed by statute, and bringing it back requires Congressional action. We’ve been clear from the beginning that the “Product of USA” rule is not a substitute.

We’re engaged at every level to get it done.

Call (202) 224-3121 and tell Congress to .

Up next: “MCOOL doesn’t work”

Great article and graphics Basic but important reminder
03/07/2026

Great article and graphics
Basic but important reminder

Late Gestation in Sheep & Goats – Article 3
When the System Breaks: Pregnancy Toxemia and Ketosis
By Linessa Farms

In the previous article we looked at how a ewe or doe produces glucose for her developing lambs or kids.

Unlike humans, sheep and goats do not absorb large amounts of glucose directly from their diet. Instead, rumen microbes ferment feed into volatile fatty acids, and the liver converts propionate into glucose.

Under normal conditions this system works remarkably well.

But late in pregnancy two things are happening at the same time:

• Feed intake often begins to decrease because the growing fetuses occupy more and more space in the abdomen.
• Glucose demand is rapidly increasing as the lambs or kids grow during the final weeks of gestation.

When those two forces begin to move in opposite directions, the ewe or doe can slip into an energy deficit.



The Body’s Backup Plan

Animals have a natural backup system when glucose supply begins to fall.

When energy intake is insufficient, the body begins breaking down stored fat to provide fuel. This process is normal and happens in many animals, including humans.

As fat is mobilized and processed by the liver, compounds called ketones are produced.

In small amounts, ketones can serve as an alternate energy source for the body. But when fat mobilization accelerates and ketone production becomes excessive, those ketones begin to accumulate in the bloodstream.

This condition is known as ketosis.



Why Pregnancy Makes It Worse

Late gestation creates a unique metabolic challenge.

The ewe or doe may already be struggling to consume enough feed because the expanding uterus reduces rumen capacity. At the same time, the developing lambs or kids are drawing increasing amounts of glucose from the mother’s bloodstream.

If intake falls too low, the body responds by mobilizing more and more fat in an attempt to keep up.

Eventually the system becomes overwhelmed.

Ketone levels rise, appetite decreases even further, and the ewe or doe may begin showing symptoms such as:

• reduced appetite / off feed completely
• lethargy
• separation from the group
• neurological signs in advanced cases

This condition is commonly referred to as pregnancy toxemia.



Why Both Thin and Fat Animals Can Be at Risk

It is often assumed that pregnancy toxemia only occurs in overly fat animals, but the reality is more complicated.

Very thin animals may simply lack the energy reserves needed to support late gestation when feed intake falls.

Overconditioned animals, however, can also be vulnerable. Excess body fat can reduce abdominal space and limit rumen expansion, which may decrease feed intake when energy demand is highest.

In addition, when intake drops, heavily conditioned animals can mobilize fat very rapidly. This sudden increase in fat metabolism can accelerate ketone production and overwhelm the liver.

The real issue is not simply body condition.

The real issue is energy balance.

When a ewe or doe cannot consume enough energy to meet the glucose demands of late pregnancy, the body is forced to rely heavily on fat mobilization, and ketosis can develop.



Why Early Recognition Matters

Pregnancy toxemia is much easier to manage early than late.

Once a ewe or doe stops eating entirely and ketone levels become very high, recovery becomes much more difficult.

Producers sometimes use products such as propylene glycol because the liver can convert them into glucose precursors. This provides temporary metabolic support while we work to restore normal feed intake.

These treatments help buy time, but the underlying goal is always the same: restoring the animal’s ability to meet her energy needs through normal feeding and rumen fermentation.



Looking Ahead

Understanding the metabolic side of pregnancy toxemia helps explain why the condition occurs, but it naturally leads to another question.

How do we feed animals in a way that reduces the risk of this imbalance developing in the first place?

In the next article we’ll step away from the physiology and look at practical feeding strategies that help support energy balance during late gestation.

Because while the biology of this system is fixed, the way we manage it on the farm can make a significant difference.

Texas winter!!! Officially ends tomorrow 🤠
01/31/2026

Texas winter!!! Officially ends tomorrow 🤠

Address

Likely, CA

Telephone

(541) 417-0284

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when McGarva Ranch Pasture Division posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to McGarva Ranch Pasture Division:

Share

Category