Gibson Family Farms

Gibson Family Farms The Gibson Family has operated a family farm since 1957 in Morocco Indiana now a 4th generation farm.

Gibson Family Farm Store LLC is one of the most up-to-date and knowledgeable custom operations and is committed to serving the needs of our customers. Whether it's chopping crops, baling and/or bagging, we are prepared to serve YOU.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1EbdiFyTzv/
06/06/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1EbdiFyTzv/

There has been a lot of discussion lately about New World screwworm, and if the name sounds like something that belongs in a science fiction movie instead of a veterinary textbook, unfortunately it is very real. The first thing to understand is that these are not your typical maggots. Most maggots are nature's cleanup crew. They feed on dead tissue. They help break down material that is already dying or dead. New World screwworm larvae looked at that entire arrangement and chose violence. They feed on living tissue. Healthy tissue. Tissue that very much belongs attached to the animal. That single difference is what makes them one of the most economically significant livestock parasites ever seen in North America.

The process is both fascinating and horrifying. A female fly finds a wound, a fresh navel, a dehorning site, a castration wound, a prolapse, a torn ear, a tick bite, or pretty much any opening that says, "Please do not lay eggs here." Naturally, she lays eggs there. Hundreds of them. The eggs hatch, and the larvae begin feeding on living tissue. As they feed, the wound becomes larger. A larger wound attracts more flies. More flies lay more eggs. More eggs become more larvae. More larvae create a larger wound. It is essentially the world's worst business expansion model. The larvae burrow headfirst into tissue in a screw-like pattern, which is where the name screwworm comes from. Somewhere there was a scientist staring at a wound and trying to think of a name and eventually said, "Well, they look like little screws," and honestly that was probably accurate enough.

What makes screwworm so dangerous is that the damage does not stay small for very long. This is not simply a case of a few larvae sitting in a wound. The wound can rapidly enlarge as more tissue is destroyed. Animals will experience pain. They may stop eating. Secondary bacterial infections can develop. Toxemia can occur. In severe cases animals can die surprisingly quickly if treatment is delayed. Cattle, sheep, goats, horses, wildlife, dogs, cats, and even humans can be affected. Before eradication, ranchers across the southern United States lived with the reality that virtually any wound could potentially become a screwworm infestation. Every calving season, every branding season, every castration, every dehorning, every fence injury carried risk. It was not simply an inconvenience. It was a major animal health and economic problem.

Then scientists came up with one of the strangest and most brilliant disease-control strategies ever attempted. Researchers discovered that female screwworm flies generally mate only once in their lifetime. That meant if a female mated with a sterile male, she would never produce offspring. So scientists began raising screwworm flies by the millions. Then they sterilized the males and released them into the environment. Think about that for a moment. Entire facilities were built for the purpose of producing flies that would go out into the world and be unsuccessful at reproducing. Somewhere there were highly educated scientists showing up to work every morning to help flies become terrible fathers. Yet the plan worked beautifully. Wild females mated with sterile males, no offspring were produced, and the population gradually collapsed.

The program expanded over time and became one of the greatest success stories in veterinary medicine and entomology. Millions upon millions of sterile flies were released. Then millions more. Then millions after that. Eventually New World screwworm was eradicated from the United States and pushed farther south through Mexico and into Central America. The reason most people have never heard of screwworm today is because generations of veterinarians, entomologists, ranchers, livestock producers, and animal health officials were extraordinarily successful at making it disappear. It is one of those rare stories where a massive agricultural victory became almost invisible because it worked so well.

Which is exactly why recent events have attracted so much attention. After years of northward movement through parts of Central America and Mexico, USDA announced a potential case in a calf in South Texas. That immediately triggered surveillance programs, movement restrictions, quarantines, trapping efforts, wildlife monitoring, and renewed sterile fly releases. Millions of sterile flies are once again being released every week because officials know exactly what happens if the pest becomes established and exactly how difficult it can be to eliminate once it gains a foothold. The goal right now is containment and eradication before that happens.

For producers, this means wounds matter. Actually, wounds always mattered. Now they matter even more. Fresh navels matter. Dehorning sites matter. Castration wounds matter. Prolapses matter. Lacerations matter. Ear tag tears matter. Surgical incisions matter. Fence cuts matter. If there is one thing screwworm flies seem remarkably talented at, it is locating the exact animal you were planning to examine tomorrow morning. Producers in risk areas are being encouraged to pay close attention to wounds, monitor animals carefully, and report suspicious cases quickly because early detection is one of the most important tools available.

The good news is that producers and veterinarians have better options available than previous generations did. Approved treatments and preventive products now exist, including products containing doramectin and fluralaner, as well as ivermectin under specific authorizations and additional wound treatments. Early intervention is critical because treating a newly established infestation is much easier than dealing with a wound that has been expanding unnoticed for days. For veterinarians, screwworm becomes an important differential diagnosis whenever there is a nonhealing wound, an enlarging wound, a foul-smelling wound, unexpected tissue destruction, or visible larvae in an animal originating from or moving through affected regions. Beyond the individual patient, diagnosis has broader implications because every confirmed case becomes an animal health concern affecting surveillance and control efforts.

For consumers, the situation looks very different. This is not a food safety panic. It is not a reason to stop eating beef. It is not a situation where grocery store shelves suddenly become unsafe. Animals entering the food supply are inspected, and affected animals do not simply pass unnoticed through the system. The primary concern is animal health, animal welfare, wildlife impacts, production losses, movement restrictions, and the economic burden placed on producers if the pest spreads. The people most directly affected are ranchers, dairy farmers, veterinarians, wildlife managers, and animal health officials who would be responsible for controlling it.

Honestly, the entire story serves as a reminder that some of the greatest victories in agriculture are the ones nobody notices. Most people have never spent a single minute thinking about New World screwworm. Most people have never thanked an entomologist. Most people have never considered that somewhere there are facilities producing millions of flies whose greatest contribution to society is failing to reproduce. Yet that strange strategy protected countless cattle, wildlife, pets, and people for decades. If you ever find yourself wondering whether science sometimes sounds completely ridiculous, remember that one of the most successful livestock disease-control programs in history can essentially be summarized as this: raise millions of flies, make sure they never have children, release them into the wild, and save the cattle industry. By all accounts, it sounds absurd. By all accounts, it should probably not work. And yet it remains one of the most effective animal health programs ever created.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Ps8b2wKt/
05/03/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Ps8b2wKt/

The longest-running experiment in human history was started by a British scientist in 1843, involves jars of wheat planted in the same fields every year for 180 years, has already outlived every person who began it, and its most important findings concern how catastrophically wrong Victorian scientists were about almost everything they believed about soil.
The Rothamsted Long-Term Experiments were initiated in 1843 by John Bennet Lawes and his collaborator Joseph Henry Gilbert on Lawes's estate at Rothamsted in Hertfordshire, England. Lawes had begun experimenting with fertilizers on his estate fields in the late 1830s, leading to the development of superphosphate fertilizer, which he patented in 1842 and manufactured commercially — a business that made him wealthy and provided the financial foundation for the experimental program. The centerpiece of the research program was a set of field plots in which wheat and other crops were grown continuously year after year under different treatment conditions — different combinations of mineral and organic fertilizers, unfertilized control plots, and managed organic plots — with detailed records of yields, soil chemistry, and atmospheric conditions maintained continuously from 1843 to the present day.
The Victorian scientific consensus that the experiments were designed partly to test held that soil fertility was primarily a chemical question — that adding the right mineral compounds would sustain agricultural productivity indefinitely and that the biological components of soil were secondary. What 180 years of continuous data have demonstrated is almost the precise opposite. The unfertilized control plots, expected to decline sharply in productivity, declined more slowly than predicted. The heavily mineral-fertilized plots showed yield improvements but simultaneously showed degradation of soil biological diversity and structure across long time scales that shorter experiments could not detect. The long-term data has been essential in demonstrating the role of soil microbiology, fungal networks, and organic matter cycling in agricultural productivity in ways that 19th-century chemistry alone could not capture. The experiment's archives, which include soil samples from every year since 1843 stored in the Rothamsted sample archive, allow researchers today to measure the direct material composition of Victorian agricultural soil — a form of scientific time travel that has proved invaluable in understanding long-term environmental change.

Address

1480 S 100 E
Morocco, IN
47963

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Gibson Family Farms posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category